Finish me

http://infowars.com/articles/London_attack/brazilian_police_tube_firm_odds_cctv_footage.htm
Interesting. Men in military garb invade a party in Utah. http://www.utrave.org/showthread.php?t=19971
Some comments posted on the forum talk about how unnessecary that act was, "This event was 100% legal. They had every permit the city told them they needed. They had a 2 MILLION DOLLAR insurance policy for the event. They had liscenced security guards at the gates confiscating any alcohol or drugs found upon entry (yes, they searched every car on the way in). Oh, I suppose I should mention that they arrested all the security guards for possession."
It's all progressive, I don't understand why the media doesn't cover this? It's happened a few times and it's "forgotten." At this rate our rights are going to be "forgotten" as well. Hell, what rights do we still have? The Bill of Rights has been raped, figuratively speaking. Having permits for something we have a right to do is unconstitutional, you can't argue with me or anyone about that because it's true. Let's talk about the Bill of Rights while we're at it. The first amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." This allows us to talk about whatever we want, whenever we want.

I want to clear something up first before going into the first amendment fully. After thinking about a comment by Alex Jones I don't think having a political label is important. I say this because I've recently said I was a Libertarian, but here's a quote I'm starting to go by. "Although labels are ulitmately meaningless, I consider myself to be a classical liberal, in the vein of Thomas Jefferson or George Washington. I believe in the Second Amendment and National Sovereignty."
And before you say, "Oh A Liberal!" Here's a definition: "Classical liberalism is a political and economic philosophy, originally founded on the Enlightenment tradition, that tries to circumscribe the limits of political power and to define and support individual liberty and private property." For some reason I don't like the word liberal. I never really have, but put classical alongside it and it seems a little better.
OK, now back onto topic. I'll be using Good To Be King as a source here on the interpretations the Bill of Rights. "It is often said that we should never talk about religion or politics in public places. Why not? It is unfortunate that expressing our opinions has been deemed socially unaccaptable. If Americans were more willing to discuss religion and politics with their friends and aquaintances, I doubt we would have the political problems that currently exist in Washington." The point is, TALK! It doesn't matter what it's about, and according to the first amendment it doesn't matter if it's offensive or not. That's the point of it. We have the right to say whatever we want, even if it offends you. If you don't like it, who said you have to listen to it? I do believe in civil arguements as well because it's more classy and respectable. However, if the need arises we can be more assertive and yell about it, there's nothing wrong with that.

Will update later, this isn't finished.
I guess I won't finish it.