"Without you, todays emotions would be the scurf of yesterday's"

I just saw Fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain, Le.
I now know where the idea from Travelocity's commercials came from.
So beautiful... 'no homo.'

But

"Michael Badnarik will:

Work to streamline the adoption process—get government out of the way of the best solution to unwanted pregnancy

Oppose tax funding for abortion

Oppose federal mandates that require companies provide abortion as a health care benefit

Oppose federal government control over the abortion issue*

Considerations:

Abortion is a volatile issue because we do not yet have a scientific determination as to the beginnig of life, so those who do not suscribe to a religious perspective on the issue insist that they or the courts may define the beginnings of life themselves. No one, legislatures included, possesses the authority to simply declare an arbitrary point at either side of which something can be declared alive or not without scientific proof. In the meanwhile, the better policy is to err on the side of caution.

Giving the federal government control of this issue could lead to more abortions rather than fewer, because the left-right pendulum of power swings back and forth. This shift could place the power to set policy in the hands of those who demand strict population control. The government that can ban abortion can just as easily mandate abortion, as is currently the case in China. Further, should abortion be found by scientific determination to be murder, this would be a state-level issue and not federal."

I think that makes more sense though as it is. My reasoning? The final provision is what, I believe, gives this issue a final 'answer', if you will, following the Constitution.

Makes sense.

Libertarians for Life was founded in 1976 to show why abortion is a wrong, not a right. Our reasoning is expressly scientific and philosophical rather than either pragmatic or religious, or merely political or emotional. Politically, of course, our perspective is libertarian. Libertarianism's basic principle is that, under justice, each of us has the obligation not to aggress against (violate the rights of) anyone else -- for any reason (personal, social, or political), however worthy.

The Libertarian Case Against Abortion

To explain and defend our case, LFL argues that:
1. Human offspring are human beings, persons from fertilization.
2. Abortion is homicide -- the killing of one person by another.
3. There is never a right to kill an innocent person. Prenatally, we are all innocent persons.
4. A prenatal child has the right to be in the mother's body. Parents have no right to evict their children from the crib or from the womb and let them die. Instead both parents, the father as well as the mother, owe them support and protection from harm.
5. No government, nor any individual, has a just power to legally depersonify any one of us, born or preborn.
6. The proper purpose of the law is to side with the innocent, not against them.

We're going to Hell.

I'm so amazed by this shit. Goddd what am I supposed to do? We have little Hitlers all over the world today and, wsdfsdfsdfsdfos, I don't know what to say or do. The people of America are powerless. Damnit. I don't know what to say. Sooner or later I bet I won't even be allowed to say what I want to. I love this!

'Bush on the Constitution: 'It's just a goddamned piece of paper'

Capital Hill Blue/DOUG THOMPSON | December 9 2005

Last month, Republican Congressional leaders filed into the Oval Office to meet with President George W. Bush and talk about renewing the controversial USA Patriot Act.

Several provisions of the act, passed in the shell shocked period immediately following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, caused enough anger that liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union had joined forces with prominent conservatives like Phyllis Schlafly and Bob Barr to oppose renewal.

GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

“I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

I’ve talked to three people present for the meeting that day and they all confirm that the President of the United States called the Constitution “a goddamned piece of paper.”

And, to the Bush Administration, the Constitution of the United States is little more than toilet paper stained from all the shit that this group of power-mad despots have dumped on the freedoms that “goddamned piece of paper” used to guarantee.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, while still White House counsel, wrote that the “Constitution is an outdated document.”

Put aside, for a moment, political affiliation or personal beliefs. It doesn’t matter if you are a Democrat, Republican or Independent. It doesn’t matter if you support the invasion or Iraq or not. Despite our differences, the Constitution has stood for two centuries as the defining document of our government, the final source to determine – in the end – if something is legal or right.

Every federal official – including the President – who takes an oath of office swears to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says he cringes when someone calls the Constitution a “living document.”

“"Oh, how I hate the phrase we have—a 'living document,’” Scalia says. “We now have a Constitution that means whatever we want it to mean. The Constitution is not a living organism, for Pete's sake.”

As a judge, Scalia says, “I don't have to prove that the Constitution is perfect; I just have to prove that it's better than anything else.”

President Bush has proposed seven amendments to the Constitution over the last five years, including a controversial amendment to define marriage as a “union between a man and woman.” Members of Congress have proposed some 11,000 amendments over the last decade, ranging from repeal of the right to bear arms to a Constitutional ban on abortion.

Scalia says the danger of tinkering with the Constitution comes from a loss of rights.

“We can take away rights just as we can grant new ones,” Scalia warns. “Don't think that it's a one-way street.”

And don’t buy the White House hype that the USA Patriot Act is a necessary tool to fight terrorism. It is a dangerous law that infringes on the rights of every American citizen and, as one brave aide told President Bush, something that undermines the Constitution of the United States.

But why should Bush care? After all, the Constitution is just “a goddamned piece of paper.”'

Oh we also have another article here on internet cencorship (if someone can control the internet which is seriously the last source of information Americans have to stayormed we're cooked. We're in for a world of hurt in the future, good luck Earth.):

'Internet Censorship: The Warning Signs Were Not Hidden

Wayne Madsen | December 9 2005

Internet censorship. It did not happen overnight but slowly came to America's shores from testing grounds in China and the Middle East.

Progressive and investigative journalist web site administrators are beginning to talk to each other about it, e-mail users are beginning to understand why their e-mail is being disrupted by it, major search engines appear to be complying with it, and the low to equal signal-to-noise ratio of legitimate e-mail and spam appears to be perpetuated by it.

In this case, “it,” is what privacy and computer experts have long warned about: massive censorship of the web on a nationwide and global scale. For many years, the web has been heavily censored in countries around the world. That censorship continues at this very moment. Now it is happening right here in America.

The agreement by the Congress to extend an enhanced Patriot Act for another four years will permit the political enforcers of the Bush administration, who use law enforcement as their proxies, to further clamp censorship controls on the web.

The warning signs for the crackdown on the web have been with us for over a decade. The Clipper chip controversy of the 90s, John Poindexter’s Total Information Awareness (TIA) system pushed in the aftermath of 9-11, backroom deals between the Federal government and the Internet service industry, and the Patriot Act have ushered in a new era of Internet censorship, something just half a decade ago computer programmers averred was impossible given the nature of the web. They were wrong, dead wrong.

Take for example of what recently occurred when two journalists were taking on the phone about a story that appeared on Google News. The story was about a Christian fundamentalist move in Congress to use U.S. military force in Sudan to end genocide in Darfur. The story appeared on the English Google News site in Qatar. But the very same Google News site when accessed simultaneously in Washington, DC failed to show the article. This censorship is accomplished by geolocation filtering: the restriction or modifying of web content based on the geographical region of the user. In addition to countries, such filtering can now be implemented for states, cities, and even individual IP addresses.

With reports in the Swedish newspaper Svensa Dagbladet today that the United States has transmitted a Homeland Security Department "no fly" list of 80,000 suspected terrorists to airport authorities around the world, it is not unreasonable that a "no [or restricted] surfing/emailing" list has been transmitted to Internet Service Providers around the world. The systematic disruptions of web sites and email strongly suggests that such a list exists.

News reports on CIA prisoner flights and secret prisons are disappearing from Google and other search engines like Alltheweb as fast as they appear. Here now, gone tomorrow is the name of the game.

Google is systematically failing to list and link to articles that contain explosive information about the Bush administration, the war in Iraq, Al Qaeda, and U.S. political scandals. But Google is not alone in working closely to stifle Internet discourse. America On Line, Microsoft, Yahoo and others are slowly turning the Internet into an information superhighway dominated by barricades, toll booths, off-ramps that lead to dead ends, choke points, and security checks.

America On Line is the most egregious is stifling Internet freedom. A former AOL employee noted how AOL and other Internet Service Providers cooperate with the Bush administration in censoring email. The Patriot Act gave federal agencies the power to review information to the packet level and AOL was directed by agencies like the FBI to do more than sniff the subject line. The AOL term of service (TOS) has gradually been expanded to grant AOL virtually universal power regarding information. Many AOL users are likely unaware of the elastic clause, which says they will be bound by the current TOS and any TOS revisions which AOL may elect at any time in the future. Essentially, AOL users once agreed to allow the censorship and non-delivery of their email.

Microsoft has similar requirements for Hotmail as do Yahoo and Google for their respective e-mail services.

There are also many cases of Google’s search engine failing to list and link to certain information. According to a number of web site administrators who carry anti-Bush political content, this situation has become more pronounced in the last month. In addition, many web site administrators are reporting a dramatic drop-off in hits to their sites, according to their web statistic analyzers. Adding to their woes is the frequency at which spam viruses are being spoofed as coming from their web site addresses.

Government disruption of the political side of the web can easily be hidden amid hyped mainstream news media reports of the latest "boutique" viruses and worms, reports that have more to do with the sales of anti-virus software and services than actual long-term disruption of banks, utilities, or airlines.

Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Cisco Systems have honed their skills at Internet censorship for years in places like China, Jordan, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and other countries. They have learned well. They will be the last to admit they have imported their censorship skills into the United States at the behest of the Bush regime. Last year, the Bush-Cheney campaign blocked international access to its web site -- www.georgewbush.com -- for unspecified "security reasons."

Only those in the Federal bureaucracy and the companies involved are in a position to know what deals have been made and how extensive Internet censorship has become. They owe full disclosure to their customers and their fellow citizens.'

Rwanda

I watched Hotel Rwanda. Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim. I feel so hopeless. What the hell is going on in this world.

"People are gonna see this say 'Oh my God, that's horrible!" and then they're gonna go back to enjoying their dinner." Can it be any truer?

Here's something I read from one of my favorite authors about the current situation in Sudan:

"

On the Atrocities in Sudan

by Elie Wiesel

Remarks delivered at the Darfur Emergency Summit, convened at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York on July 14, 2004, by the American Jewish World Service and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Sudan has become today’s world capital of human pain, suffering and agony. There, one part of the population has been – and still is – subjected by another part, the dominating part, to humiliation, hunger and death. For a while, the so-called civilized world knew about it and preferred to look away. Now people know. And so they have no excuse for their passivity bordering on indifference. Those who, like you my friends, try to break the walls of their apathy deserve everyone’s support and everyone’s solidarity.

This gathering was organized by several important bodies. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Committee on Conscience (Jerry Fowler), the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, the American Jewish World Service (Ruth Messinger) and several other humanitarian organizations.

As for myself, I have been involved in the efforts to help Sudanese victims for some years. It was a direct or indirect consequence of a millennium lecture I had given in the White House on the subject, “The Perils of Indifference”. After I concluded, a woman in the audience rose and said: “I am from Rwanda.” She asked me how I could explain the international community’s indifference to the Rwandan massacres. I turned to the President who sat at my right and said: “Mr. President, you better answer this question. You know as well as we do that the Rwanda tragedy, which cost from 600,000 to 800,000 victims, innocent men, women and children, could have been averted. Why wasn’t it?” His answer was honest and sincere: “It is true, that tragedy could have been averted. That’s why I went there to apologize in my personal name and in the name of the American people. But I promise you: it will not happen again.”

The next day I received a delegation from Sudan and friends of Sudan, headed by a Sudanese refugee bishop. They informed me that two million Sudanese had already died. They said, “You are now the custodian of the President’s pledge. Let him keep it by helping stop the genocide in Sudan.”

That brutal tragedy is still continuing, now in Sudan’s Darfur region. Now its horrors are shown on television screens and on front pages of influential publications. Congressional delegations, special envoys and humanitarian agencies send back or bring back horror-filled reports from the scene. A million human beings, young and old, have been uprooted, deported. Scores of women are being raped every day, children are dying of disease hunger and violence.

How can a citizen of a free country not pay attention? How can anyone, anywhere not feel outraged? How can a person, whether religious or secular, not be moved by compassion? And above all, how can anyone who remembers remain silent?

As a Jew who does not compare any event to the Holocaust, I feel concerned and challenged by the Sudanese tragedy. We must be involved. How can we reproach the indifference of non-Jews to Jewish suffering if we remain indifferent to another people’s plight?

It happened in Cambodia, then in former Yugoslavia, and in Rwanda, now in Sudan. Asia, Europe, Africa: Three continents have become prisons, killing fields and cemeteries for countless innocent, defenseless populations. Will the plague be allowed to spread?

“Lo taamod al dam réakha” is a Biblical commandment. “Thou shall not stand idly by the shedding of the blood of thy fellow man.” The word is not “akhikha,” thy Jewish brother, but “réakha,” thy fellow human being, be he or she Jewish or not. All are entitled to live with dignity and hope. All are entitled to live without fear and pain.

Not to assist Sudan’s victims today would for me be unworthy of what I have learned from my teachers, my ancestors and my friends, namely that God alone is alone: His creatures must not be.

What pains and hurts me most now is the simultaneity of events. While we sit here and discuss how to behave morally, both individually and collectively, over there, in Darfur and elsewhere in Sudan, human beings kill and die.

Should the Sudanese victims feel abandoned and neglected, it would be our fault – and perhaps our guilt.

That’s why we must intervene.

If we do, they and their children will be grateful for us. As will be, through them, our own."

As a side note, fuck the ACLU: http://prisonplanet.com/articles/november2005/301105aclushysters.htm

"How do you boil a frog?

You don't throw the frog into a pot of boiling water, it would immediately jump out. You let the frog sit in warm water and slowly heat the pan until the frog boils to death."
Use this idea in modern-day America.

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce." James Garfield

“I sincerely believe ... that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” Thomas Jefferson

Auzubillah "major signs will follow each other like pearls falling off of a necklace..."

love - death - american beauty

Thanksgiving...
Weird day today I guess. After this one moment tonight I had to think a lot about what someone said. However insignificant the gesture may be, it really made me think. If it sounds goofy, well, so be it. Fearless isn't the word, yet, you see. Anyway, my family and I went to my uncle's home in Wilton today and all of that good stuff. The part I want to talk about is when I was just sitting in the car talking to Semso about stuff when Nevzeta, my other cousin, comes in. I'm not sure what she said exactly but she was asking him about his love life and how wild he must be with the women. Semso was a little embarrassed or whatever and said, "Oh man you don't know Irf, he's wild as hell with the ladies." I laughed, but saw Nevzeta look at me with some sort of... disgust. It was really subtle, you can't tell these kinds of things unless you know her. But oh not Irfan, he couldn't possibly be human... After that it was a little awkard for like five seconds then she left. It's like Semso is supposed to be some special amazing guy, everyone always has comments like that about him it's amazing. I could never be jealous, that's just fuckin stupid, it's just life and my family.

Because of that encounter I was thinking about my future and whatever else came to my mind. Marriage or my love life was the first thing on my mind. I've always thought I would be the best boyfriend any woman could dream about, except I'm not dumb nor am I the fake image most women want: tough. When I mean tough I'm talking about the stereotypical type of guy that women love. I'm really intimate, I guess. For some reason as much as women beg for some guy that knows how to treat them right, they never end up liking the guy. Whatever, good for you, go get beat up and enjoy your partner's toughness; it's really "attractive."

When I think about marriage and what-not I can think of myself in a few scenarios when I'm older. My first idea is to be the ideal Irfan and be some good looking single guy who "dates" a lot of women. The second idea that sticks is being married and happy, the storybook ending with fireworks at the end. The third idea is the most depressing: to never get married or do anything.
I dream about the first idea sometimes, but I would have a hard time being that person.

The second ending is beautiful I'm sure for the first few years, so I think about the investment bankers on Wall Street.

Personally, I'm fine with being lonely in the third one. I've been that way my whole life and it's quite easy to stay the way I've always been. Sometimes, my family asks when I'll get married and sometimes I say, "Never." to see what they say. I know Nevzeta can disagree quite easily with that one, from what I know I'm guessing she loves it. But I know they'll probably grow bored. If there's anything I'd want it would be to find out some method to stay in love with someone forever. However that may be, that should somehow prove that there is no such thing as true love. There is no "one" that you search for your whole life. Just two things: your heart and mind. It's weird, I'm in love with so many women at the moment. My heart is so easy. I don't consider myself a Casanova, but I can't tell if I would be happy going through with it with all of them or not. Sure, my hormones think so, but what about my superego? So therein lies the problem, should I go all-out or all-in? Most of the advice I hear is something like, "Have a lot of fun and then settle down with some virgin chick." But dude, that's such a bullshit idea. I could believe in something like Eddie Murphy said on "Raw" back in the eighties. You know, about doing whatever you want "and settling down with someone that's just as fucked up as you are." It sounds fair enough, but that's still not enough reason for me to have fun. I know my dad would say some shit like, "What happens there stays there." Because his mind works differently and he's unhappy. I don't understand how you can be such a bastard. Am I the only person that thinks this way? What the hell do I do? I only hope the answer finds me before I find a wrong answer. But maybe there is no answer, you know. Maybe you just do whatever you like. There's no set path to happiness so there probably isn't a set path for love. For some reason I feel like the third path is the only open one and it might regretably lead me to the first option. True love is something that takes place in your mind, not your heart. Your heart just does its job by keeping you alive and giving you the funny feelings when you do love someone. What's the point of explaining these feelings that others have been trying to for thousands of years.

Love
...Is
......Just
.........Complicated.
(Ignore the periods, Blogger has bad formatting. It's from a poem.)

And beautiful. Deep down, I really feel like the second option will come through. I'll figure it out sooner or later.

Today after the feast I watched American Beauty today which played a part in inspiring me to write this. The movie is so weird it's great. I love the double entendre of "American Beauty" and now I know why my English teacher, Sujay Desai, loved it. Two years later from when I actually had his classes. Wow. You should just watch it for yourself. Don't limit yourself, "Man, oh man. Man, oh man, oh man, oh man, oh man."

As a side accessory here's some lyrics to this song I've been listening to literally for the past few days over and over. Zero 7 - In the waiting line

" Do you believe
In what you see
Motionless wheel
Nothing is real
Wasting my time
In the waiting line
Do you believe
In what you see

Everyone's saying different things to me
Different things to me
Different things to me
Different things to me
Different things to me
Everyone's taking everything they can
Everything they can"

Am I?

"When an artist doesn't explain his art, that is pretentious."
I've watched like 4 movies in the past 4 or 5 days. It started with The Shawshank Redemption then it went to Garden State on TV, after that it was the Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, followed by Requiem for a Dream, and finally today Donnie Darko. I guess that's five, not four. I have another movie, 21 grams, downloaded. I'll probably watch it tomorrow when I'm out for Thanksgiving break.
God, movies are awsome. I wish my life would end with some sort of storybook ending like in Donnie Darko or Garden State, but I have trouble accepting the fact that this shit is fake. Real life is so boring compared to movie life, but clearly movies are shown for its action otherwise they wouldn't sell. I love the quote at the end of Donnie Darko where he says, "Deus ex machina" I'll leave it to you to figure out the history behind those words.

Something Ironic

Something I found interesting ironically posted on Congress.org:

If I believed in conspiracies, I might believe in one with a scenario that goes something like this:

[*the simplistic version] An Election takes places in this country where a group of very powerful, very rich would-be Autocrats rig and steal the Presidency. Shortly afterwards, a massive terrorist attack takes place, one which is very convenient to the cause of these would-be Autocrats and their ideology. In fact, in their writings they were hoping for a New Pearl Harbor and it was delivered to them in the most dramatic manner. The attack not only was useful in their global imperialistic desire to conquer other nations, but also in their goals to eventually change the very fabric of this nation's government, Constitution and society.
The Autocratic Puppet President and the man pulling the strings behind him, his secretive Vice-President Puppet Master and the Puppet Makers behind them have done all the right things to ensure that the agenda of their Neo-Conservative-National-Socialist Party has infiltrated the government. The Puppet President really believes that "dictatorships are great as long as he is the dictator".
Under the guise of Patriotism, they force Congress to pass an Act which has it's primary focus on eliminating the Rights of the Citizens, not terrorism. In fact, they make it possible to virtually destroy the Right of Habeas Corpus and give themselves the power to declare any Citizen an "enemy combatant", toss them in prison without charges, trial, or any of the legal Rights guaranteed them in the Constitution.
Another Presidential campaign comes and goes, except this time political dissent, free speech and visual opposition are all contained far from the Puppet President's campaign trail. The Autocratic Puppet President is naturally re-elected during war-time and begins his second term.
They then seek to hold more control over the Citizens and have Congress pass a national ID Act, one in which they are able to basically track and gather information on each and every Citizen.
Another disaster hits the nation, this time a natural disaster that is vastly destructive and the response of the agency that manages such disaster is, very conveniently, a dismal failure. The failure of the agency responsible for managing disasters gives the Autocrats a perfect opportunity to eliminate the only law that keeps the Military from being used by the government for domestic law enforcement, and opens the door for the plan to eventually impose martial law upon the nation.
Scandal rocks the Neo-Con-National-Socialist-Party, the war is going poorly, yet the Puppet Makers and their Puppets continue to drive their policies to fulfillment. Patriotism is still the "newspeak" trigger word that they use to inflame the nation for their cause.
With another Presidential Election a couple of years away, the plans of the Neo-Con-Socialist Party must carried out with perfection. Although their man is not allowed by the Constitution to serve as President again, in their minds, that is no reason to remove him from Office.
It is a few months before the election, another convenient attack takes place within a large city, the attack kills tens of thousands of people and the plan is executed. A national emergency is declared, martial law is imposed. Executive Order becomes law, the Constitution, Congress and Supreme Court are suspended. All guns are confiscated from the Citizens, private ownership of gold and silver is declared illegal, all information in the media and on the internet is regulated and now only promotes the Party Propaganda Line. All political dissidents and opposition groups are declared to be "enemy combatants" and are imprisoned.
The Neo-Conservative National Socialist Party is now in absolute power.

*Disclaimer-this story is, of course, just a simplistic work of fiction.

I believe that the Republican Party has been, for all intents and purposes, hijacked by the Neo-Con National Socialist. I also believe that the Democrats and the Republicans are now just two sides of the same coin and they all dance to the tune of Corporate Fascism. While I have been a Republican for decades, I can no longer support the Republican Party nor can I turn my allegiance to the Democratic Party. I can now only support the one Party that has the true interest of the Citizens of this Nation at heart, and that is the Libertarian Party. Although I am not in total agreement with the Libertarian Party, I do believe that they are the Party of the People.'

RfaD

Just saw Requiem for a Dream. Wow... Wow. Fuck drugs, and addictions for that matter.
I think this might have just killed my own. Movies are so powerful.. I'm in awe from the movie, anyways I'll be talking about love in my next post because these thoughts have been in my head for too long to forget about it.

Jon Stewart is

A genius: http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2652831?gtv=12
The legendary performance on Crossfire which probably lead to the show's cancellation. Good riddance. Check out how he owns Tucker near the end, haha.

Tucker Carlson: Moron in disguise.

As some of you may know, Professor Dr. Steven Jones has written a 25-page paper hypothesis as to how the Twin Towers may have fallen. I've been saying what he has for a while, but check out what happens when you mix two absolute negatives: The truth and a propaganda machine, http://infowars.com/articles/sept11/professor_jones_exposes_controlled_demo.htm
You don't have to read the text below the video. I just want to illustrate a point so watch the video. Tucker is scared literally shitless when he hears what the professor is saying. That's not the only part I found funny. There's even more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8063563/#051116a

"When one of my producers first told me about him, my first thought was: Stephen Jones is insane. And he may be. On the other hand, he does have a legitimate job and a responsible-sounding title. He's not living in the park, or writing me letters in crayon. How crazy could he really be? In the interest of open-mindedness, we booked him.
That was probably a mistake...
Professor Jones wasn't up to the job. If you saw last night's show, you know what an uncomfortable six minutes it was. If not, I'll summarize: Jones was almost totally incapable of explaining his own ideas. By the end of the interview I understood no more about his hypothesis than when it began. He was an epically bad guest."

Wow, you're a moron Tucker. "Totally incapable of explaining his own ideas." What the hell? Perhaps he could if you weren't interrupting him every five seconds you ignorant prick. Why didn't you run the clip he asked you with WTC 7 going down? Oh, he showed us beautiful pictures of rubble instead. Tucker didn't even answer him when he asked to show the clip. If you assholes are so damn sure the Twin Towers fell because of the Planes and jet fuel wouldn't you show his video and refute his claim? Obviously you have something to hide. You're a fucking tool Tucker. I'm so pissed at his shit I can't help but swear simply for emphasis. Oh, and take off your gay bowtie too Tucker. It doesn't make you more original or appealing to the viewers ,rather, a brainwashed douchebag...

Next we see this asshole trying to spit out some more propaganda rhetoric here: "
In other words, a lot of people seem to think it's possible that the U.S. government had a hand in bringing down the World Trade Center buildings.

Ponder that for a second: The U.S. government killed more than 3,000 of its own citizens. For no obvious reason. Then lied about it. Then invaded two other countries, killing thousands of their citizens as punishment for a crime they didn't commit.

If you really thought this - or even considered it a possibility - how could you continue to live here? You couldn't. You'd leave the United States on the next available flight and not come back. You'd have no choice. Continuing to pay taxes to a government capable of something so evil would make you complicit in the crime."

Hmm, that makes so much sense!! Oh wait, asshole, you forgot two essential elements: Money and power. "For no obvious reason" should be "In an attempt to scare the American people into submission to give up our rights for security, as well as, an insane budget to go to war with so called terrorists. So called terrorists because they were actually trained by the CIA, I just thought you should know. Anyway, with big events like this big amounts of money can be made like Larry Silverstein and the Oil in Iraq. The attack on America was a jump pad to invade these other countries for reasons other than "punishment." Megalomaniacs are in control of this country. Just ask Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
"Continuing to pay taxes to a government capable of something so evil would make you complicit in the crime." It wouldn't make us complicit in the crime. We have no idea where our money is going, but it is known that some money actually has gone to training terrorists. Why would we do that anyway? I guess that gives us more reason to not pay taxes.
"Incidentally, we still have an open mind here on the Situation, even after Professor Stephen Jones. So if evidence ever does arise that the government lied substantially about what happened on September 11th, we'll be on it immediately. I promise." I can't explain how much awe I was in reading that. You don't know, at all. The words, "I promise." I don't know what I'm feeling now because it's so new and weird. You didn't even read his paper, did you? Twenty-five pages, and not one struck a cord? Ultimately, thanks for putting the link on your website. You've possibly just converted most of your viewers to the truth so I can't blame you for that, but you're still an asshole. I hope for the non-believers sake most people read this and see right through Tucker's fake voice and see the evidence this great professor presents. GGkthnx.

Interesting write-up: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/janak/050725
"We are not free so do not kid yourself"
The UN's new slogan should be something like, "Socialistically uniting the world one country at a time."
America has been blinded by keeping her head too close to the TV.

Libby

"Scooter will probably end up like Oliver North. Ollie was indicted on sixteen felony counts and convicted of three in connection to the so-called Iran-Contra Affair—accepting an illegal gratuity, aiding and abetting in the obstruction of a congressional inquiry, and destruction of documents. His conviction was over-turned by a three judge panel. As a reward, Ollie received a book contract and eventually his own television show on Fox News, thus once again demonstrating crime pays."
It sure does.

Liberty

"Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; [if] it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it."

I never knew much about former president Clinton, but he sure was "good"... at raping the Constitution. "The era of big government is over" Haha okay: http://cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-271.html

I'm bummed out. Without having economic power we'll have no political power.
Back to warcraft, no one cares.

This reminds me...

'

Howard Fineman: Rove Non-Indictment a Bush 'Victory'

Newsmax | October 29 2005

Newsweek magazine reporter Howard Fineman, who's been at the forefront of recent media speculation that top White House official Karl Rove would be indicted, has pronounced Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's decision to indict only Cheney aide Lewis Libby "a victory" for the Bush White House.

"Given the expectations that have evolved around here in the last week or so, if it turns out that this phase of the grand jury ends with only Scooter Libby being indicted," Fineman told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough last night, "that will be seen as almost be seen as a backwards kind of victory here."

Scarborough agreed, saying that the indictment of Libby without Rove would be, "a huge political win for the White House."

Fineman said Rove, not Libby, was Fitzgerald's "big fish."

"Karl Rove is a big national figure and as close to the president of the United States as you can get without being a member of the president`s family," he told Scarborough. "And so, politically, Karl Rove is the much bigger fish here."'

I wonder what they were talking about during the multiple meetings before the indictments... This looks like a bad recreation of some Shawshank-type deals. And hail yet another, "Victory!" I love America.

Wisdom

“Strengthen your argument and not your voice.”
I'm reading the Cato Handbook on Policy(Link) and am about 70 pages in. It's hard to get these facts down considering there's around 700 pages to understand. Memorizing even half of the facts and arguements is a feat in itself, the whole book would be just as hard as the seven days. Well, you get the idea. Ideally I hope to educate my family, although I've lost some respect for some, and have them appreciate all of this.
It's sort of like a scenario in the fable The Alchemist where the alchemist asked some stranger if he wanted the secret to longevity. Hearing this the stranger laughed and rejected the offer. The alchemist told the main character that people won't accept the truth even though it's right there before them. However, since this is a fable the whole longetivity thing is not true, but it's the basic idea that if the truth is in front of them people have trouble seeing it. I feel what I know is the truth. I've been searching for my whole high school life and I'm sure other people say the same with their own beliefs, but the difference is that they delve too deeply into it and won't allow themselves to think more open-mindedly. I'm happy thinking I know what will happen after I die so I'll concentrate from now on to give as much as I can to the world. Not like Jehova's Witnesses by travelling door to door, that's vain. I'm not sure what the plan is for the future, but I'll work for it.

I'm listening to the song, GZA - B.I.B.L.E. (Basic Intstructions Before Leaving Earth)

Evergrowing self-actualization.

Freedom!

http://nchscivicsoutreach.blogspot.com/
It's funny seeing kids from my school use the internet. My whole life I've used it to stay away from them, but it's hard for me to understand the whole scenario. Like, I live two lives. My normal one on the internet and with close family members, and then there's the other side of life in my school which I act differently in.
Anyways, that link above is for my Civics class. It's for some outreach project, and amazingly, no one knows jack about American government. I have to brush up on my persuasion skills because they're all so damn blind. It's not their fault, I would be making the same candy dandy responses to impress my teacher; I might sprinkle some glitter on top and make a swelling lump look nicer. But guess what? It's still the same trash under that guise. They hunt for people's minds like a kid would with sprawled out on a floor filled with money they tell us to be proud of what we [don't] have. "Freedom! Those foreigners are just jealous! Pass this Bill which has potential for full-scale monitoring of all Americans, it'll make us freer!" ... I can't stand it. Enough.

Soon

Too much reality, not enough updating. I don't care anymore about posting this stuff on my this blog. This guy Alex Jones like devotes his life to this cause so go check out his website: infowars.com. That's where I copy and paste this from. I'll try to keep it all about me or from me from now on, if that's possible. I have a headache on my temples from this weird thing I've been trying to pop and the only thing that comes out is some sort of water. I don't think it's poison ivy because I'm never around plants, but who knows?

Soon, oh how I can't wait for 'soon'. Read my mind, eh.

New Orleans

Damn, I never thought something like this could have happened. No I don't mean the storm, I'm talking about the aftermath. What is wrong with FEMA? First of all, if they're the Federal Emergency Management Agency shouldn't they be managing this situation? What do I mean? Well, (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05246/565143.stm) "As the National Guard delivered food to the New Orleans convention center yesterday, American Red Cross officials said that federal emergency management authorities would not allow them to do the same."...' "The Homeland Security Department has requested and continues to request that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans," said Renita Hosler, spokeswoman for the Red Cross. '
Why is that? They're not allowing Charities to help out and at the same time imposing Martial Law and declaring a zero tolerance policy against looters. It's like they're trying to kill these people. Why is there Martial Law there anyway? Well, it's a tough arguement. I see some of them have actually been shot at even though there's no reason to. I think people should loot only what they need to survive. Plasma TVs don't count. Check this out too:

"9:30PM Thurs Sept 1. Update: Please help spread this message:

There are supplies sitting in Baton Rouge for the folks in New Orleans, but the National Guard has the city surrounded and is not letting anyone in or out. They are turning away people with s[QUOTE]upplies, claiming it is too dangerous. If we have planes that can drop bombs on people in Iraq, certianly we can air drop supplies into the city. Our goverment is KILLING the people of New Orleans. This is the message I am now sending to all major media sources, national and worldwide, as well as posting to email lists, blogs, etc. The story is getting out that the people there are not getting supplies, but the truth of WHY is not. Please help spread the word, we must get this story out. Please so not let any more of my friends die.

I can be reached at 254.640.8441 - feel free to call me or give my number to any media that needs a contact person to talk to.

Here is my message:

I am a resident of the Bywater in New Orleans (9th Ward). I am one of the lucky ones that was able to evacuate before the storm.

I have recently managed to speak to some friends stranded in New Orleans. They are starving and dehydrating and there is no news of when they will be receiving food and water. I have spoken to relief efforts and understand that there are plenty of supplies waiting for these people, BUT THEY ARE NOT BEING ALLOWED INTO THE CITY.

The National Guard has the city surrounded and is not letting anyone in or out, except the buses being evacuated. The excuse that they can not bring supplies into New Orleans because of the looting and gun fire is not a valid excuse - if they are too afraid to enter the streets of New Orleans, they need to be air dropping supplies into the city. If the United States is capable of sending planes that can withstand enemy fire to drop bombs in Iraq, certainly they are capable of air dropping supplies into a city where the worst of the gunfire they could encouter would be from semi-automatics.

Our government is killing the people of New Orleans. By witholding supplies, they are ensuring more deaths, and I hold them complicit.

Please bring this matter to the attention of the people of the United States. They need to know that New Orleans is deliberatly being denied food and water. Perhaps if the people there had food and water, they might not be shooting off guns.

Please feel free to call me for further information or with any questions. I appreciate your attention to this most serious matter.

I fear for my friends.

Sincerely,

Andrea Garland
Get Your Act On! (getyouracton.com)

On another note, Jeffrey and I are in the process of getting a large vehicle and loading it up with donated supplies needed for longer term cleanup efforts (generators, chain saws, solar cooking equipment, etc.). Some basic info and a paypal link is at Get Your Act On!(getyouracton.com) and more detailed info will be posted later. Please help spread the word about this, as well. We live 6 blocks from one of the hardest hit areas in New Orleans, so we intend to bring these necessary tools to our neighbors.

Also heard that part of the reason our house flooded is they dynamited part of the levee after the first section broke - they did this to prevent Uptown (the rich part of town) from being flooded. Apparently they used too much dynamite, thus flooding part of the Bywater. So now I know who is responsible for flooding my house - not Katrina, but our government."

Well on a lighter note I'm starting school tomorrow, sort of weird. I've figured out since the school doesn't really care about me in any way any more I'll do everything for myself only. I suppose it's time to start being what I've tried to hide from. I may like video games, but I'm not content with them anymore. Isolation is possibly the only way I can achieve a goal. I'm going to try to do what's right and have no regrets in the future about this final school year. No regrets.

The sun's setting now, the tainted spread,
as a cowl is placed over light's head.
In an asylum on the border line I wait,
in a sort of Purgatory state .
A fate sealed, I hesitate.
What fate? Don't hesitate.
Words are perpetual. Life awaits.
Why hesitate? Shape your fate.

http://www.lptn.org/news/articles/96
Kind of late on this ruling. Didn't know it happened on June 24th. Amazing.
"The 5-4 ruling, issued on June 22, 2005, declares that local governments have the authority seize private property against the owner’s will in order to allow some other private organization to use the property for “economic development” purposes. The 5 majority judges were John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Bryer."
Our most basic right as Americans, gone. The right to own property. This is the plan they use, it's unbelievable how people have trouble seeing through the lies. They write the Patriot Act and say it's for our protection, they take away our right to own for "econonic development", they control it all and give us bullshit excuses to support them. There is no Constitution anymore even if they say it's still there. When the time comes we'll know these mesaures are not for our protection, but for our apprehension. Why would they protect us? Do you think they really care about us? They won't even talk about the Genocide in Darfur on any News channels because hey it's not their problem, right?

What do we do to fight back? I don't know, criminals fill Washington. 5 our of the 9 Justices are Communist bastards, Congressmen allowing any of this to happen should be fired for not doing their job, and the President impeached for treason. They're everywhere. I think the only part able to lead this Government the way it should have been are Libertarians and it's not limited to them only so don't think I'm some extremist. I can change, but this makes too much sense it hurts. When you think about it, do you think this is a part of the God's plan? I think so. Here is a list of 50 signs before Judgement Day. http://www.ummah.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-1651.html
Sign 22 reads: Trustworthiness will be lost, i.e. when authority is given to those who do not deserve it. I think that sign is talking about America and the people in charge. The problem I've been having for the past ten minutes is reading the signs of the future, it doesn't talk about or make slight references about a Police State in any way after Sign 22. So America probably won't last long or just be another short-lived modern Nazi germany. Well, that only means the people will prevail, I hope so. I have to shower now, talk to you later.

Finish me

http://infowars.com/articles/London_attack/brazilian_police_tube_firm_odds_cctv_footage.htm
Interesting. Men in military garb invade a party in Utah. http://www.utrave.org/showthread.php?t=19971
Some comments posted on the forum talk about how unnessecary that act was, "This event was 100% legal. They had every permit the city told them they needed. They had a 2 MILLION DOLLAR insurance policy for the event. They had liscenced security guards at the gates confiscating any alcohol or drugs found upon entry (yes, they searched every car on the way in). Oh, I suppose I should mention that they arrested all the security guards for possession."
It's all progressive, I don't understand why the media doesn't cover this? It's happened a few times and it's "forgotten." At this rate our rights are going to be "forgotten" as well. Hell, what rights do we still have? The Bill of Rights has been raped, figuratively speaking. Having permits for something we have a right to do is unconstitutional, you can't argue with me or anyone about that because it's true. Let's talk about the Bill of Rights while we're at it. The first amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." This allows us to talk about whatever we want, whenever we want.

I want to clear something up first before going into the first amendment fully. After thinking about a comment by Alex Jones I don't think having a political label is important. I say this because I've recently said I was a Libertarian, but here's a quote I'm starting to go by. "Although labels are ulitmately meaningless, I consider myself to be a classical liberal, in the vein of Thomas Jefferson or George Washington. I believe in the Second Amendment and National Sovereignty."
And before you say, "Oh A Liberal!" Here's a definition: "Classical liberalism is a political and economic philosophy, originally founded on the Enlightenment tradition, that tries to circumscribe the limits of political power and to define and support individual liberty and private property." For some reason I don't like the word liberal. I never really have, but put classical alongside it and it seems a little better.
OK, now back onto topic. I'll be using Good To Be King as a source here on the interpretations the Bill of Rights. "It is often said that we should never talk about religion or politics in public places. Why not? It is unfortunate that expressing our opinions has been deemed socially unaccaptable. If Americans were more willing to discuss religion and politics with their friends and aquaintances, I doubt we would have the political problems that currently exist in Washington." The point is, TALK! It doesn't matter what it's about, and according to the first amendment it doesn't matter if it's offensive or not. That's the point of it. We have the right to say whatever we want, even if it offends you. If you don't like it, who said you have to listen to it? I do believe in civil arguements as well because it's more classy and respectable. However, if the need arises we can be more assertive and yell about it, there's nothing wrong with that.

Will update later, this isn't finished.
I guess I won't finish it.

Music

I thought of something interesting a little while ago. You know, with Emo music. I've been listening to FuseTV's Emo music video's and they're honestly all about the same thing. They're always singing about how they can't live without their girlfriends and how "depressed" they are, then some even go on talking about hurting themselves by something like slitting wrists. What I thought was, Emo music is the same trash as Boy Bands. It's the same damn little kids who are now a little bit older and now they're so sad but years ago they sang, "I wanna be with you" to the next album's, "Show me the meaning of being lonely." Now after they got older and realized how terrible these songs were they found Rock, kept those feelings, but now sing them with a new tune. That sounds about right, and what's pathetic is most of these kids are terribly unoriginal; they just hop on the bandwagon and see how far it takes them. Make some sense. Enough with my crappy rant, that's just "The Truth" in my mind's eye.

On L.

I've been reading a lot about Evolution vs. Creation and it's VERY fascinating. Although I am a creationist, I do read both sides with an open mind and try to give both respect. Through experience in the topic the only thing that could ever change me is the presence of "missing links" even though no one has found any yet. If evolution is such a rational and right explanation, don't you think there would be more evidence and less observations? We've done SO much excavating and with that we should have found things like half-bats or other links, but we haven't found anything at all. After seeing things like fossils of ants who haven't evolved for the past 100 million years or dragonflies for the past 135 million I can only conclude it can't be real. Until there is hard evidence and not, "It makes sense because everyone says so" I can't believe it. I guess if we haven't found it yet the chance of finding missing links in the future would be impossible. Well anyways, enough talk about evolution/creation. I've got more to talk about now below.

Since this is a new idea I've been developing I warn you this won't be well structured so give me advice.
Well, after hearing a few things about some people and unused advice from some other people I'm starting to doubt if there is true love. What do I mean? It's pretty deep, but it's an interesting thought. Having to choose between contradictory beliefs, I find myself doubting if love is actually that great a thing. Love is a strong feeling with additional hormones to emphasize the feelings. There can't be such a thing as true love with another human being (but I do believe in true love with the higher being). Since there's only one God(assuming you believe what I do), and He has infinite power you can love him through fear, gratefulness, or both. With humans it's different.

One piece of food for though is even if you're in love with one person, you can fall in love with another or many others. It's known that the hormones of love fade away after about 3 years with the partner because you know them personally and not as the sexy counterpoint you didn't know. After those three years, it's all up to your mind and your sense of loyalty to stay with that person. Assuming true love is with one person: Loyalty and true love go hand in hand, without one you can't have the other. There can't be a destined relationship between two people, the couple is only together because they both are extremely loyal(or one is materialistic.)

The advice I get from close adults is interesting, they say have as much fun as you can with as many girls as you can before you marry. But another friends word is, "In the end you'll be a lot happier if you are a virgin and marry a virgin. These people who go around today screwing all in sight won't be happy at all. It's better for you." Using these two opinions I tried inventing what I'm writing about now, but I'm not so sure that it's going to work out the right way. Will I actually be happier with opinion one or two? How do I know for sure if I can't do one over the other? Some people talk about "onegina" and how marriage is a terrible bond, why? According to the masses, polyamorous relationships rules while monoamorous may be more boring. I also ask, when has the public ever been right? Right now, my decision is monoamorous because I feel like I'll live life with a storybook ending even though my first attempt was so stupid and pathetic I don't even want to talk about it. The only deciding factors on choosing between the two is: "Is it really that good?" and "What does Religion say?". From what I've heard, some people say it's not that great while others say it's fantastic. Is it really that good or are you so sex-crazed that even your brain has become a sperm-manufacturing facility? What does Religion say? Well I already know. I don't really care about how good it is anyways, what's the point of doing it so much to make yourself happy if it's not that amazing. If it is amazing, I guess that whole situation explains itself. Life is short so I suppose doing whatever you want with one person you trust and know is a much better feeling in your heart, mind, and soul than it would be with a bunch of "towels." So about this whole true love thing, don't use the heart only because the heart is much more prone to mistakes than your driving force: the mind. Use both and choose wisely. If you can keep yourself loyal with one person and have as much fun with a special other that's better than any storybook ending because it's real. Purity is a rare find to come across these days, when I or anyone else finds it I hope for only the best. I talk about love like I'm actually going to fall for it. I'm like Nikola Tesla in a way, even though he was a virgin his whole life I feel like I might be too because I can care less. Wow, I just found out Tesla also read a book I loved and memorized it, "At that age [24], I knew entire books by heart, word for word. One of these was Goethe's Faust." Wow, word for word... That's something you think humans can't do, but damn I can't believe he loved that book as much as me. What can I say? Great minds think alike. Well, anyways I feel really inspired to read so I might as well do that before my little inspiration timer runs out. Bye

Oh Washingingtonienne!
"By popular demand, I have finally created a key to keeping my sex life straight.

In alpha order:

AJ=The intern in my office whom I want to fuck.

F=Married man who pays me for sex. Chief of Staff at one of the gov agencies, appointed by Bush.

J=Lost my virginity to him and fell in love. Dude who has been driving me crazy since 1999. Lives in Springfield, IL. Flies halfway across the country to fuck me, then I don't hear from him for weeks.

MD=Dude from the Senate office I interned in Jan. thru Feb. Hired me as an intern. Broke up my relationship w/ MK (see below).

MK=Serious, long-term boyfriend whom I lived with since 2001. Disastrous break up in March, but still seeing each other.

R=AKA "Threesome Dude." Somebody I would rather forget about.

RS=My new office bf with whom I am embroiled in an office sex scandal. The current favorite.

W=A sugar daddy who wants nothing but anal. Keep trying to end it with him, but the money is too good.


Shit. I'm fucking six guys. Ewww.

Good Luck Iran

“Vice President Cheney’s office has specifically told the Pentagon that the military should be prepared for an attack on Iran in the immediate aftermath of ‘another 9-11.’ ”
Guess where we're going next America? Of course Iran won't have anything to do with the next "9-11" either. This is so bad, so bad. I really really hope the Sears Tower isn't next on the to-do list, but I have a feeling it is. What has this world come to? "The Iran matter seems very serious to me -- it may trigger a major international crisis because, if Iran doesn't go back on its decision, then Iran will be, I would say, in a purely unilateral position," French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy told reporters after a cabinet meeting chaired by President Jacques Chirac." It doesn't even matter if Iran pulls the plug on that because we're going in there no matter what. All I can say is, "Power is temporary." If there is a WWIII , I hope we follow CATO's lead and re-create our government the way it was supposed to be: limited.

I also hear that Syria is coming after Iran, not surprising is it?
It's early.

Care

Found this on maddox and thought it was pretty funny:

"Warblog: A blog that primarily deals with war. Filled with whiny blow hards who are fixated on their stubborn ideas and conspiracy theories. For example, there are countless hours pissed away by conspiracy theorists who think the WTC towers were demolished by bombs planted by the government. These armchair engineers write endlessly about how the physics of the collapse was impossible, how the temperature wasn't hot enough to melt steel, and how the planes were carrying missiles. Of course, the one thing they don't postulate is a REASON.

My personal favorite warblog was one that had a flash animation with people who were quoted as saying "it didn't sound like a plane to me... it sounded like a missile." Thank you Joe Nobody for giving me your expert opinion on what missile sounds like, because gas station superintendents are usually the best people to ask about the sonic signature of ballistic missile thrust."

I thought it was funny becuase in a way he represents the nations ignorance. There is a reason behind it too, just follow where the money goes and you'll see the reasoning behind it all. One thing I don't understand is where someone said the "planes were carrying missles." I've never read that anywhere and so I figure he only brands this subject as stupid is because he got his information from the wrong place. I like his writing a lot since he's hilarious and never serious. So it could be, instead of a dis, some sort of recognition. But no, probably not he sounds pretty firm in it. If instead of reading some insane 40 year old dude's blog he saw a credible video, he might change his mind. I'm not offended at all, why should I be? That's something one of those bitchy soccer moms would do, she'll blame society and have them change their rules just for her. Anyways, it has to be true: Buildings do not fall because they're "on fire." It doesn't matter to him anyways, "Warblogger: Like all other bloggers, an idiot. Usually a self-righteous prick with a political axe to grind. Tragically, these dullards fail to realize that nobody cares what they think. And no, the 2 comments per post you get on average doesn't count. Get some real opinions, then maybe you'll get some real feedback." He's right though, "nobody cares what they think." I should just give up, I mean it's not like I'm doing anything about it anyway. I'll keep my eye out but my mouth shut, untill he comes back to tell me that I was right all along. Then again, what if I was wrong? I can't believe that, after seeing the evidence from these movies nothing can really change my mind. I'm here trying to save you all, but you're all the same. Why was there so many people against Jesus even though what he was doing was right? I sort of feel like I'm in that position, but I don't believe he was on the cross. Who knows, I should change what I write about now anyways. Warblogging is pretty inane when it's saying the same stuff over and over and hope people believe you. If we can't do anything about it then why do we try? Media has screwed up everything, and I'm tired of writing this stuff when now I begin to see no one cares...

Truth in rambling

"Pull out of Iraq" is the talk right now of the press. Bush says if they do give us a timeline on when to pull out, the terrorists will just wait until then and then re-claim everything like in Vietnam. I know there are a few terrorists in this world, but after doing my own research it's made that number so much smaller. The event known as the 'airlift of evil'(you can Google it) is simple. 'The United States took the unprecedented step this week of demanding that foreign airlines provide information on passengers boarding planes for America. Yet in the past week, a half dozen or more Pakistani air force cargo planes landed in the Taliban-held city of Kunduz and evacuated to Pakistan hundreds of non-Afghan soldiers who fought alongside the Taliban and even al-Qaida against the United States.' What am I trying to say? Most of the people you hate are paid by the money you send to the IRS. So when people say drug dealing supports terrorism, I say "so does paying taxes."
Oh, and another note about drugs. After we took over Afghanistan isn't it interesting that Opium growing has skyrocketed? What's also funny is how Afghanistan manages to grow more than 80 percent of the worlds supply. If drug dealers only sell drugs and get caught, why aren't the guys making the most money growing them caught? Or why isn't there a sort-of War on Drugs over there? Oh that's right, I'm sure the government regulates it in one way or another. Check out the lyrics from the song Peruvian Cocaine
I talk about this stuff so often now it's unbelievable; and to think this is "America: Land of the Free." Well, "Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore." I feel so obligated to do something about this all, but it sucks feeling like I have no power even though in a real America I should. Wherever there's "sovereign individuals" there's peace, that's the truth.
Now there's the London bombings, and as usual with terrorist events, you'll see many contradictions. Why? Sadly enough it had to be set-up too. Enough with the truth, the public hates it and I hate the public for that. They're too busy drinking and smoking their minds to a pulp, let them have it. Besides the public when people say this quote, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." and think they're special because they read books, that's not much more different. Unless you really know what's happening in the world, you're not part of that small group of thoughtful citizens. If that's too harsh, it has to be because everything you know and all the work you've done could be in vain. Why does it seem that where Truth should be, propaganda and lies are filled to the brim? It's like Truth is in the muddy waters on roadsides that cars run over and spray pedestrians. What's the reaction when the average joe/sally is on the recieving end? "Get it off of me!" I think truth isn't something that's exactly hated though like that quote may seem. People sometimes "just don't know" like me. If you're born tabula rasa it's probably going to be hard for everyone to find what I have Our lifestyles are different, and that has to be the main contribution to ignorance: Some people just don't care. In the end as I read over this rambling on, I might as well stay informed but stay to myself. I've been thinking about writing my own poems and songs of sorts because it would be a nice change, trying to be creative is something people have been doing since the beginning. The problem I have is with my vocabulary, I hate being able to understand a lot of words but not being able to converse with them. The solution is: Learning through synonyms. That's the easiest way, so I should start sometime soon.

Jefferson was right.

"That government is best which governs least." Some people say it's misattributed, but that's not important. "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." History is the the only "Google" you need to figure out what may happen in the future or in our case: what's happening now.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." That's for you Rosie O' Donnell and all of those Hitler-esque gun-control psychos. No, I don't think she's insane like Hitler at all. I think She's confused like the majority of uneducated Americans. Now am I educated? That I can't answer, I don't have the arrogance to yell yes nor the humbleness to say no, but what really is education? A high school graduate degree, or a Ph.D? One has a general knowledge of all things while the latter is extensive knowledge in one or few things. I don't have the extensiveness yet, but I feel like both certificates reside beside me and more.
Anyways here's another one: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies…if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency...the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent that their fathers conquered.” The Federal Reserve is not affiliated with the government, check out the blue pages--it's not there. I feel hopeless, the only thing I can do is sigh knowing these things and feel even worse feeling like I can't do anything about it. There is hope and the only test is time, no one's ever beat it and nothing ever will(even the Universe the only thing that can is God). Power is temporary: "What country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure." Power corrupts, so I hope we follow Jefferson's schematic instead of Hamilton's next time around and see what we we should have been. The men in power of our country today do not reside in the White House anymore, God help us. "On matters of principle, stand like a rock."

65

There's so much to say, this post will probably be unorganized the way all of the others have been. First of all, I've discovered this new artist and he's great. His name's Immortal Technique and is already my favorite rapper. Why? He speaks what I think is the truth," Cause opening your mouth to question my validity Is like trying to contradict the theory of relativity." I don't know how to prove it to you, I've been reading a lot and have changed my thoughts on many things. The thoughts I've switched to are the thoughts Immortal Technique also believes in. People say he's a super weird eery conspiracy theorist, but that's bullshit. Having seen a video in slow motion of WTC going down, what more evidence do you need? Well, there's also the firefighters that are still alive today who have all said they believe bombs were in the building. Now they have shutup, it's sad to see what the government can do. Hell even Silverstein(the guy who bought the entire WTC complex) bought out a huge insurance plan before 9/11 on all of the buildings. He also said in an interview that they had to "pull" building seven, meaning implode, meaning everything you've heard is bogus. Buildings like the WTC don't fall down from "being on fire," it doesn't work like that. It takes weeks to set up the bombs in a building and Silverstein says it like it takes a few hours, but it doesn't. There was a photo taken one second into Building seven's collapse, in the middle of the building there was a "crimp." If we look at other controlled demolitions we see that they first blow the central columns so the building falls in on itself. If you don't do that, the building falls outward and has a wider collapse radius and damage other buildings. In building seven, a controlled demolition was the case. No airplane hit it, the fires weren't very strong it was basically fine. What was in there? Information, just like the Murrah Federal Building which stored stuff on Waco. Building Seven was also like that, it was practically a command center for the whole operation and had the information. Silverstein owned only Building seven but two months before the attacks, he bought out the whole complex and took out a record insurance policy on it. Even worse is the seismographs, the bombings of Towers 1 and 2 registered 2.1 and 2.3 with the "classical pattern of a controlled demolition." Basically 9/11 is a huge coverup and it's bull. Immortal Technique, in one of his more recent songs says, "Bush knocked down the towers." I don't know if Bush did this or not, but I do know someone or few people did and I still can't believe it.
It's late, there are the facts I've harvested from Alex Jones' 9/11- Rise of the Police State.

Money

Murray N. Rothbard
"Since 1980,the Fed has enjoyed the absolute power to do literally anything it wants: to buy not only U.S. government securities, but any asset whatever, to buy as many assets, and to inflate credit as much as it pleases.There are no restraints on the Federal Reserve. The Fed is master of all it controls."

Currency backed by Gold is better than the current system, that's the truth. I just watched some film about The Federal Reserve, and it's true. The only reason we have our system is when we are in war. Presidents have called upon TFR and use it to print out extra funds instead of increasing taxation. A system with Gold is stable and any American can put their trust in there. If we follow this system we're currently in, our future is dependent on one special person. The government that uses a Central Bank takes another step on the road to absolute or great power. Therefore, in order to limit the power of our government, it's necessary to impose a different non-central bank. Thomas Jefferson was against a Central Bank because a smaller government is better. He was right, because power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. That's why I'm basically a Libertarian/Constitutionalist, the government is supposed to be very limited. Our administration has figured out how to dismantle the Constitution and Bill of Rights by using a simple scapegoat, terrorism. The funny thing is, they're the terrorists. All major "terrorist" events were done by the government, not only ours. 9/11, Madrid, London, Bali, it's sick... Their attempts to cover up is so transparent and pathetic, they are a bunch of lunatics. The Patriot Act passes without even having Congress vote on it, and it's disgusting. They've taken away so many rights away from us even if you don't recognize it. There are no terrorists, there is no Al-Qaida, unless you think of it as "Al-CIA'da" because it's their invention. The CIA uses whenever they want to do something. Damnit, this shouldn't be happenning. I wonder, how could we fix it? There's one way, the easy and dangerous way, but I don't know if the effects would be good or bad. That way is to assassinate these top leaders, but who would do that? All the criminals are making money and no one would want to do that. Exposing the truth is tough to do, especially with the controlled media. I wish there was some way we could regain the media, that would be the best way and probably the only other way. Why would it be the only other way? Because the last way would have to be having control over the judicial system, which they already have. We just need to learn how to say "no" to the government, they set up this illusion that they have power and if you do say no they'll hurt you. We should also educate the police all of these things, since they have to be the most misinformed to be protecting these assholes. The sad thing is, the only truth anyone can find is not on the TV or newspaper, rather, it's on the internet. Thank God for the 'net because without it, who knows what would become of this world? Damn how did I go from money to this? Anyways, I just hope the transition was good. I really have this deep yearning to become a politician to help change our course, and marry this other girl who wants to be a politician to set up some sort of double threat. Kinda crazy? I don't know, I wish sometimes there was a crystal ball that would show me. Perhaps there isn't a set future so there isn't really destiny, but then again there is the Qu'ran which provides us with a list of events to occur before The Last Day. Major Bloodshed is on the list and looking back at the past 100 years there has been an enormous amount of it, I really hope this New World Order doesn't workout but then again it probably will. One of the other signs of the last day is Jesus' second coming and when he comes back, there will be a collapse of all society. Now if I can deduce my own idea from those last 5 words, I think society will have to become terrible if it just collapses because Jesus will return when there is terrible longing for him. Half-life 2 may seem like it's far, but just like "1984" I don't think it's that far away. I really pray and hope he comes soon, torture is terrible and the media is now saying "oh it's not so bad." What bullshit, evil is disgusting but apparently it may be inevitable. I'm going to post before my computer restarts, good night.

All Falls Down

I'm already half-way done with Candide, I checked it out of the library today. Not a very long story but a very interesting one. So I'll be done with it tomorrow and I'll keep reading after that. This conspiracy theory site about the government and everything is damn crazy. I'd be surprised, but not That surprised if America actually became the next great dictatorship like Nazi Germany. It would obviously be a bit different than 50 years ago but still have many common things. The warfare used will be mostly psychological because the media owns countless souls and the elite will constantly keep everyone fearing. I'll just keep my eyes open and mouth closed and point my finger hoping the real culprits get blamed. Conspiracy theory is not really my kind of thing so I'll leave it up to guys like Alex Jones, to keep fighting his good fight. After seeing the video of the Twin Towers going down in slow motion, and seeing what looks like bombs exploding as the cloud of dust from the building heading south, I can't believe the towers fell because "they were on fire." The film 9/11 Rise of the Police State showed its evidence, and it's crucial. I say you download or support him by buying it and see for yourself. Basically, it says there were bombs planted in all 3 big buildings: 1, 2, and 7. Hell, Silverstein even admits he "pulled" building 7(meaning implode) so it wasn't by a fire you could see by the way it fell down, the center blew first so the building fell in a tidy rubble pile. The same thing happened in towers 1 and 2, they planted explosives all over the buildings. There's just so many signs. I thank God as well, for basically helping shoot down Flight 93 which was on it's way to the Capital. It probably was going for the White House so Bush could have called for total Martial Law, but since they screwed up and God foiled their plans, they've got a lot to cover up. Don't worry though, there will be another attempt at Martial Law, I'm sick of this. "Al-CIAda," and everything. I'm just dissapointed with the world, you know? I thought these "adults" would be a bit more "mature." They've got control of all the funds with communist things like the Central Bank, it's insane. Now there's gun control, and dumbass moms like Rosie O'Donnell who adamantly support gun control, just like Hitler and these other murderers. I just hope if America falls, that we follow the Constitution the way it was meant to be, with presidential candidates like Badnarik to guide us with his knowledge.

It's already 3:30 I'm going to sleep, later.

A slogan I've seen on the internet:
"Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!"(Referring to Hitler, Stalin, MaoTse Tung, and even here in America where our 2nd Amendment is trampled on.)

Loose Change

http://propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2005/060705controlleddemolition.htm
"On The Record: The Controlled Demolition Of The WTC"

It's part of a documentary named Loose Change, and it's scary as hell. I think this is the most profound clip you could watch that would change your opinion on 9/11. It basically says that the WTC was bombed not only by airplanes, but with supplementary charges throughout the building. The film talks about how strong the steel was, even if the airplane hit the buildings without the charges it wouldn't have fallen or melted. The problem though is, when you watch the video, there are slow motion scenes which show charges blowing up as the building heads on its eternally nostalgic trip South. It also interviews firemen and they say they heard many other explosions other than the impact. It was was pulled off professionally, like imploding broken down Casino's when someone wants to build a new one. You need to watch it, this is the kind of stuff news channels wouldn't show in a 1000 years, or until America crumbles. Power is temporary, I hope America doesn't prematurely "end" at all. The Constitution was well written but has been loosely interpreted, which shouldn't have happened. After all of these years of loose interpretations, the government has powers that it shouldn't have in the first place. After hundreds of years of these interpretations here we are: Screwed and on the verge of death-- hey maybe that's being planned too? The government's supposed to be controlled by the people, not the other way around. It's sad to see it become the way it is, but that's corruption for you.
I'm even reading things that say there's no such thing as "al-Qaeda." I hate to think of myself as a deep conspiracy theorist because I've read other stuff before and it's total bullshit. I'll be done reading stuff soon, I hate getting "too into it" with these things. Since I don't really want to be a full-time conspiracy theorist I praise the people who do it with hopes of showing the "real truth" to the public and succeed. If only we had more "Deepthroats" that would snitch. Rap songs really have a low regard for snitching, but in today's government it would be damn good. I guess for their gangs snitching is bad, but I'd like to see it in the government. If not that, at least have the Libertarians win more political spots to show the public the way it's supposed to be. Then we can rise up and put the government in the positition it's supposed to be by serving us, not the other way around.

I've only got one question for Libertarian's since I don't really know the answer: If we can speak freely and say whatever we want, what happens to sexual harassment and other "speaking limits"?
A lot of things have been happening, back to reading though. I'm going for Voltaire's Candide now, I should get it at the library tomorrow. After that I don't know maybe I'll finally finish the Divine Comedy or something. Who knows? I'll just choose whatever is available. I'm going to bed, peace.

London

Wow, these bombings in London are a scary sight. What's even scarier is this link: http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0889_what_behind_london_attacks.html
Wow man, who would have thought? Our governments do this dirty work and hurt their own people and say "terrorists" did it. It's all a front for war, the article says Islamic radicals have no reason to attack England. They've already agreed to pull out their troops and that's good. With this guise of Islamic terrorism in London I hope people don't fall for it and have a blind hatred like we did after September 11th. Read the article and think about it, I can't f'ing believe that the government would do that. I guess this is the way God orchestrated it all to be if we're on a set path. It's all so interesting, I will love every moment when our government's corruption crumbles. God damn, it's so sad to see these kinds of people in power. There's this sense of rightousness in my heart to go out and become the president and end all of this, is that what I was destined to do? I'm unsure, but I have this feeling that I can make a difference. Or can I? It would be fun to see the world crumble, but then again it wouldn't be. I love this country and its history too much to see it crumble. My heart's been set on fire with a passion for Liberty, what do I do? That would be scary, to see myself up there trying to be a goody two-shoes. It's a responsibility and there are so few good people in the government. Is there such thing as destiny? Damn, I can actually see myself trying to be like that, helping people out and keeping out corruption. What's sad is, moments after I can see myself also being killed by those who are corrupt. It's a good reason to think twice about it and ask myself is it really for me? I've always said that I want to be remembered in history, ever since I was small. So should I? It's not instantaneous but Damn it's a scary thought. Questions, questions... I'll just keep myself occupied with books before I make that decision, good night.

The Communist Manifesto

Only a few minutes after my last post, but I had to finish this post before I would forget about it because: Don't do something tomorrow if you know it can be done today. This is going to be taken from Badnarik's book so I hope he doesn't mind(but it's copyrighted, so he will.) Anyways, I'll take it from the book:

"Do you recall the John Adams quote concerning property? It is: "The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence."
Clearly, if communists intend to abolish private property, they do not consider it "as sacred as the law of God." Without property, you have no rights. That is why communism is evil. A closer examination shows that the first plank describes what communism intends to do, and planks two through ten describe how they intend to do it.
Let's take a brief look at each plank. As you read, keep track of how many of these policies already exist in the United States. Keep a tally on a seperate sheet of paper, or put a check mark along side each paragraph that describes an agency or policy here in the land of the free.

The Communist Manifesto
1. Abolition of private property
America's war on drugs has prompted government agencies to establish asset forfeiture laws which allow the arresting agency to take all of the property belonging to someone suspected of being involved with drugs. Frequently, the arresting agency is acting on an anonymous phone call. The property is then sold at auction for a fraction of a cost, and the arresting agency keeps the money.
Whenever our government invokes eminent domain to take someone's property, they are demonstrating their lack of respect for private property, and acting just like any other communist regime.
2. Heavy progessive income tax
A progessive income tax means the mor emoney you make, the higher your percentage of tax. In the United States the IRS determines the perecentage of our progessive income tax. Those percentages are included as a table with the instructions with your 1040 form. If you make enough money, you may be lucky enough to fall in the 50 percent tax bracket. The strongest slaves are lucky enough to carry the heaviest rocks.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance
If your parents die without a will, the government may take half of everything your parents owned before you and your siblings are allowed to divide what's left. Even with a will the government can take a percentage. This prevents future generations within a family from accumulating a significant amount of wealth. What justifies this tax on dying?
4. Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels
Anyone who travels internationally must declare whether he or she is carrying more than $10,000 in money, stocks, or bank notes. Friends of mine who intend to relocate to New Zealand have been told they cannot take their money with them.
5. Central bank
The Federal Reserve Bank is a private company and not a part of the American government any more than Federal Express is a part of the U.S. Post Office. You can prove this for yourself by searching the blue government pages in the phone book. When you fail to find it there, try looking in the white business pages. When you control the printing of money, it doesn't matter who controls the government. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is completely, totally, and unquestionably unconstitutional.
6. Government control of communication and transportation
The Federal Communications Commission controls all radio and television signals in the United States. The Federal Aviation Administration, National Transportation Safety Board, and every state department of transportation and motor vehicles control every aspect of transportation in this country. You cannot travel, ship, or broadcast anywhere in the United States without getting government approval.
7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture
Government doesn't actually own factories, but it also has no business bailing out Chrysler and savings and loan associations when they get into financial trouble. The recent collapses of Enron and WorlCom have suggested innapropriate connections with the government. The U.S. Department of Agriculture controls and regulates nearly every aspect of the food chain, from farm to table.
8. Government control of labor
Innumerable government agencies within the United States regulate nearly every facet of every kind of business. Although there is no formal government agency that directly controls unions, they are strongly influenced by federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA).
9. Coroporate farms, regional planning
In the not-too-distant past, most farms were owned by small families. Now they are owned by large corporations and merely leased to the original tenants.
Every large city in the United States has a regional planning office. Austin, Texas, has a Planning and Design Office, a Planning/Enviornmental and Conservation Services Department, and a Planning and Economic Development office. Check your phone book to find similar agencies where you live.
10. Government control of education
There is no point arguing wheter or not the government controls education in this country. The Democrats and Republicans are falling all over themselves to be the ones who control it best.
When the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare(HEW) was established in 1953, American students ranked number one the world in the fields of math and science. Students from every other country were eager to come to the United States to get a good education. Eventually the Department of Education became a seperate entity, but as of 2003 this country has experienced fifty years of government control of schools.
Statistics now rank American students as twenty-first in math and science. Our schools are now filled with children who can't read or write, and we spend ten times as much per sutdent as we did in 1953. Even if the Department of Education was constitutional, which it is not, it should still be eliminated for doing such a terrible job.
So what was your total? Eight? Nine? Ten? I have always held that if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it is probably a duck, regardless what the crowd around me is calling it. If the United States is already practicing all ten of these communist principles, then we must be living in a communist country. Does that give you a warm, cozy feeling inside, or are you suddenly concerned about the people in Washington who have promised to protect your rights?"

Amazing book you really should buy it, Good to be King by Michael Badnarik. If you can't do that and you have a high-speed connection then you can just download his Constitution Class, which is basically the same thing at: http://www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik. This is the kind of stuff you don't learn in our governmentally controlled schools, good job Gov' keep it up!...